CO129-124 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [8-9] — Page 416

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

407

raved ouw the remains of having the greater part of the wall, I confess that I think Mr Wilson is sanguine in considering "the rubble foundation" and "two footing" injured.

9.

corro es whan the main expense should fall they must be greatly disheartened, and I question if they will not throw to be still of the $17,000 expended - already by Government since 1864 on the at least $14,000 may be regarded as utterly lost, whilst on the other hand the $23,864, for which Mr Wilson reports the Government still liable in the event of the work probably exceed resumed would if the new wall is to be being $30,000, if the string chained

10.

as be now recommends: As for the tenants up their lots somer than encounter further risks. To test them I have desired a Circular to be sent to them stating that, if they do not forthwith commune The filling and reclamation of their lots a both works behind the Sea Wall, should progress simultaneously, proceedings will be taken against them for recovery of the original heavy rental which they agreed to pay, but of 9/8th of which they were provisionally relieved of for certain period as explained in

Edit History

2026-05-19 21:45:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
407 raved ouw the remains of having the greater part of the wall, I confess that I think Mr Wilson is sanguine in considering "the rubble foundation" and "two footing" injured. 9. corro es whan the main expense should fall they must be greatly disheartened, and I question if they will not throw to be still of the $17,000 expended - already by Government since 1864 on the at least $14,000 may be regarded as utterly lost, whilst on the other hand the $23,864, for which Mr Wilson reports the Government still liable in the event of the work probably exceed resumed would if the new wall is to be being $30,000, if the string chained 10. as be now recommends: As for the tenants up their lots somer than encounter further risks. To test them I have desired a Circular to be sent to them stating that, if they do not forthwith commune The filling and reclamation of their lots a both works behind the Sea Wall, should progress simultaneously, proceedings will be taken against them for recovery of the original heavy rental which they agreed to pay, but of 9/8th of which they were provisionally relieved of for certain period as explained in
Baseline (Original)
407 raved ouw the remains of having the greater part of the wall, I confess that I think Mr Wilson is sanguine in considning "the rubble fonidation " and two footing" minjured. 9. corro es whan the main expense should fall they must be greatly disheartened, and I question if they will not throw to be still of the $17.000 expended - already by Government since 18614 on the мочки at least $14,000 may be regarded as utterly lost, whilst on the other hand the $23,864, for which Mr Wilson reports the Gou aument still liable in the event of the work probably exceed resumed would if the new wall is to be being $30,000, if the string chened 10. as be now recommends: As for the tenants up their lots somer than encounter further risks. To test them I have desired a Cicular to be sent to them stating that, if they do not forthwith comune The filling and reclamation of their lots a both works behind the Sea Wall, should progress_simultanemsly, proceedings will be taken against. them for recovery of the original heavy rental which itrey agreed to pay, but of 9/8th of which 2 provisionally relieved them of for curtain period a.o explained in
2026-05-19 21:45:57 · Baseline
View content

407

raved ouw

the remains of

having the greater part of the wall, I confess that I think Mr Wilson is sanguine in considning "the rubble fonidation

" and two footing" minjured.

9.

corro es

whan the

main expense should

fall they must be greatly disheartened, and I question if they will not

throw

to be still

of the $17.000 expended - already by Government since 18614 on

the

мочки

at least $14,000 may

be

regarded as utterly lost, whilst on the other hand the $23,864, for which Mr Wilson reports the Gou aument still liable in the event of the work probably exceed

resumed would

if the new wall is to be

being $30,000, if the string chened

10.

as

be now recommends:

As for the tenants

up

their lots

somer

than

encounter further risks. To test them

I have desired a

Cicular to be

sent to them stating that, if they

do not forthwith

comune

The

filling and reclamation of their lots

a

both works

behind the Sea Wall, should progress_simultanemsly, proceedings will be taken against. them for recovery of the original heavy rental which itrey agreed to pay, but of 9/8th of which 2 provisionally relieved them of for curtain period

a.o

explained in

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.